UK time is: 10:30:49
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Where does the blame lie?

It was 2.05 and the announcement that the game had been cancelled was met with disgust from home and away supporters alike.

Since then, a mini media circus of accusations has errupted from both camps, as well as the referee as to why the match was called off of late.

Naturally, the referee, Matt Haywood, took responsibility, but since this, the Saddlers management have pointed the finger at Canaries boss Paul Lambert, who is said to have complained at the state of the pitch, which led to a late inspection.

However, this is the true timeline:

At 6am, Saddlers groundstaff arrive to check on the pitch, after frostcovers were placed on the pitch on Boxing Day. At 11.30am, referee Matt Haywood arrives at the Banks's to inspect the pitch, which is deemed playable.

However, Haywood met with the Norwich boss at 1.45pm, which led to further inspection and the game being called off 20 minutes later.

Our stance seems to be that there was no indication that there would be another inspection before kick off, as the referee had stated that he was pleased with the progress and state of the pitch. However, the game was postponed citing 'player safety' as the reason.

Strange! Hutch has gone on record stating that the pitch was in worser conidition for the last home game against Leyton Orient and that the pitch was playable.

Roy Whalley has also added his thoughts on the match, saying that because the referee had consulted the Norwich management team, who had disclosed their disgust at the state of the pitch, the game would not have been called off.

Norwich chief executive David McNally has recently responded to our statement on Canaries.co.uk: 'Once again, we wish to point out the only person ultimately responsible for the decision to call off the match is the referee. Whether we agree with his decision or not is immaterial - the responsibility for deciding whether the fixture can go ahead is his and his alone.

'We are surprised and disappointed that they appear to be questioning his professional integrity over this matter.'

So there is no denial that Lambert met with the officials?

Another can of worms that had been opened was whether the away fans should receive refunds, to which we said no.

However, Norwich appealed against this decision and we are now offering refunds to any fan that cannot attend the rearranged date for the fixture.

I think we can all agree that this was a shambles, but ultimately the responsible man for this is unfortunately the ref himself.





Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Writer: Rich Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Wednesday December 30 2009

Time: 12:11PM

 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Articles

Smith Confirms 'No Ground Share' (Thursday June 20 2013)

Walsall FC Fixtures 2013/14 (Wednesday June 19 2013)

Purkiss Set To Stay - Twitter (Tuesday June 18 2013)

New Kits Revealed (Monday June 17 2013)

Capital One Cup 1st Round Draw (Monday June 17 2013)

Cutler Joins Backroom Staff (Friday June 14 2013)

The Butler Did It - Now Your Turn (Thursday June 13 2013)

Walsall Seeded For Carling Cup Draw (Wednesday June 12 2013)

Chambers Twins Sign Up! (Tuesday June 11 2013)

Archived Articles

List All Vital Saddlers Articles

League Results (view all)

Latest Results

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
18. Sheff Utd 0 0 0 0 0 0
19. Shrewsbury 0 0 0 0 0 0
20. Stevenage 0 0 0 0 0 0
21. Swindon 0 0 0 0 0 0
22. Tranmere 0 0 0 0 0 0
23. Walsall 0 0 0 0 0 0
24. Wolves 0 0 0 0 0 0

Breaking League News

Transfer Rumour - Batt Release By Millwall
» Leyton Orient : 20/06/2013 10:22:00
Rudd Returns On Season Loan
» Preston : 20/06/2013 09:49:00
REPORT: Roberts Seals Chesterfield Switch
» Swindon : 20/06/2013 09:46:00
Frampton Moves On
» Gillingham : 20/06/2013 09:40:00
Smith Confirms 'No Ground Share Issue'
» Walsall : 20/06/2013 08:49:00
RUFC - Reaction From The Alex
» Rotherham : 20/06/2013 08:34:00
RUFC - Stadium To Host Annual Meet
» Rotherham : 20/06/2013 08:29:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Out Of Contract - Who Would We Miss Most
Suggested By:  Steve
Will Grigg 20%
Febian Brandy 61%
Adam Chambers 19%
Other 0%